Which population is represented?
The result names the official table, geography, population group, and publication year behind the starting estimate.
Evidence and accuracy
A longevity estimate is only useful if you can see how it was built and where it breaks down. Til100 publishes that, for free, inside the app — and describes the standard here.
Til100 currently uses confirmed age, region, and applicable sex-at-birth to match an official life table. This makes the starting context personal, but it is not an exact end date or a complete personal prediction. Stronger path stays unnumbered until confirmed clinical inputs and the matching model pass external and subgroup validation.
Why no single number
A population life table describes outcomes for groups, not what will happen to one person. Til100 publishes its source, population, year, method, uncertainty, and limitations together instead of turning them into a personal accuracy score.
The result names the official table, geography, population group, and publication year behind the starting estimate.
The range describes a conditional population distribution. It is not a promise, a personal confidence interval, or the headline.
In this version, chosen health data supports trends and actions. It does not change the population starting estimate.
What the model card contains
22 profile data points · public basis
Each point has a declared job and a traceable research basis. The questions are grouped into a short flow; they are not 22 separate screens. Chinese population evidence is shown first when it covers the construct, with international cohorts used where needed.
Today, only age, region, and applicable sex at birth select Current Path. The other 19 points improve profile coverage, action context, limitation checks, or readiness for a separately approved regional model. They do not add or subtract lifespan years in the Early model.
Research basis
China-PAR cardiovascular risk equations ↗Public algorithm · daily-signal-v2
Today Signal answers one limited question: how recent passive health patterns compare with your own baseline. It is a 0–100 product feedback index—not age, diagnosis, mortality probability, or a clinical score.
A future Path Review is decided per approved underlying factor—not from this composite score—and requires factor-specific evidence, approved model use, at least 21 valid days in 28, a material-change rule, and 90-day confirmation. Current wearable inputs remain coaching-only and are not used by the lifespan model.
Original research
The evidence gate
A health factor may enter production scoring only after its source set, exposure definition, effect shape, confounding limitations, transportability, coefficient extraction, and statistical and safety approval are recorded in the evidence registry.
AI
A deterministic service owns the population starting estimate and every approved health output. The AI layer reads approved structured facts and reviewed sources to explain, prioritize, and draft. It cannot diagnose, recommend medication or supplements, or turn an unconfirmed inference into a health fact.
In the app
The app shows the population, geography, year, method, and limits behind the number. Connected health data is separately source-labelled in trends and actions.
Release status →